Loaded data file C:\Users\zirbel\Documents\JAR3D\\HL\3.48\diagnostic\HL_RandomMotifSequencesNonCan_9.mat
UUUG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -6.56, deficit  2.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  71.18, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.98, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.31, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.98, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.31, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CCAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.36, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CCCG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.67, deficit  0.85, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  59.50, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CUCG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -3.83, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GUUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.54, deficit  0.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.51, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
UAGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -6.94, deficit  4.02, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  57.71, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GAGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -5.08, deficit  2.16, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  77.27, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.54, deficit  0.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.51, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CUCG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -3.83, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
UGAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -6.84, deficit  3.92, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  58.75, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.15, deficit  2.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.45, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
UUUG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -6.56, deficit  2.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  71.18, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CAAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -3.66, deficit  0.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.24, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.15, deficit  2.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.45, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
CGGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.15, deficit  2.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.45, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
CCCG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.67, deficit  0.85, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  59.50, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
AAGU 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -5.10, deficit  2.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  77.10, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUCG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -3.83, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
UGAA 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.84, deficit  1.92, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  79.76, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUCC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.03, deficit  0.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.89, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
AGGU 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.22, deficit  2.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.72, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
UCUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -7.52, deficit  1.92, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.24, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
UGAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -6.84, deficit  3.92, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  58.75, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CAAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -3.66, deficit  0.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.24, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UUUG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -6.56, deficit  2.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  71.18, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.98, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.31, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.54, deficit  0.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.51, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.98, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.31, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUCC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.03, deficit  0.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.89, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
AUCU 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.05, deficit  0.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.66, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CUCG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -3.83, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUCG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -3.83, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CCUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -6.00, deficit  0.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  64.28, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
AGAU 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -5.00, deficit  2.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.14, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUCG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -3.83, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.98, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.31, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.34, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.62, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
AUUU 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.56, deficit  0.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.29, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
UCUA 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -5.80, deficit  0.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  66.33, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
CGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUCG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -3.83, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GUUU 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -6.70, deficit  2.87, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  69.80, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CCCG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.67, deficit  0.85, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  59.50, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CCAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.36, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGAAC 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.91, deficit  0.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.32, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
CGUGG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -5.45, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55                                 
CAGAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -4.81, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  88.44, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGGAC 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -4.27, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.42, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55                                 
CCAAG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_70970.1,  5 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -5.89, deficit  1.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.90, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F-s35                             
CAUCG 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -5.32, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.48, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGAGC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_05692.1,  3 NTs,                CGUAGG,score      -7.79, deficit  1.87, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.78, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGAAG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.55, deficit  0.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  96.13, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
UGAGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_90197.1,  5 NTs,                UGUAGG,score      -5.75, deficit  2.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.18, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55-s35                             
AAGGU 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.90, deficit  1.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.85, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CUCUG 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -3.84, deficit  0.05, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  99.44, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F                               
CGAGG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_05692.1,  3 NTs,                CGUAGG,score      -7.71, deficit  1.79, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  49.56, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGCAG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.18, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
GGAAC 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.91, deficit  0.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.32, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
GACCC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_12703.2,  5 NTs,                 GGCCC,score      -4.94, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  63.04, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
CGCGG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_69459.1,  2 NTs,                CGCGUG,score      -7.74, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.48, ed 99, 1 cWW                                     
CGCAG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.18, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
GUUUC 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_33507.2,  4 NTs,                 UUUUA,score      -3.11, deficit  0.14, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.51, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F-s55                           
GGAAC 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.91, deficit  0.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.32, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
CUUUG 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_33507.2,  4 NTs,                 UUUUA,score      -3.09, deficit  0.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.65, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F-s55                           
CUUUG 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_33507.2,  4 NTs,                 UUUUA,score      -3.09, deficit  0.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.65, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F-s55                           
CGCAG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.18, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
GCAUC 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -8.40, deficit  5.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.31, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGAAC 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.91, deficit  0.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.32, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
CAAAG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -3.71, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUGCG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.81, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
UGCAA 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.60, deficit  0.42, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  95.57, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
UUCUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.00, deficit  2.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  76.61, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F                               
CAACG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -4.81, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
ACUCU 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_70970.1,  5 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -5.38, deficit  1.16, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.21, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F-s35                             
CAACG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -4.81, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
AUUUU 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_33507.2,  4 NTs,                 UUUUA,score      -3.10, deficit  0.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.61, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F-s55                           
UGCAG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -5.63, deficit  2.45, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  74.22, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
CUUUG 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_33507.2,  4 NTs,                 UUUUA,score      -3.09, deficit  0.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.65, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F-s55                           
GGCGC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_12703.2,  5 NTs,                 GGCCC,score      -6.04, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.48, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
GGAGC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_05692.1,  3 NTs,                CGUAGG,score      -7.79, deficit  1.87, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.78, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
UGAGA 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_05692.1,  3 NTs,                CGUAGG,score      -7.80, deficit  1.87, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.69, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CAAGG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_94352.4,  5 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -5.94, deficit  0.91, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  58.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-F-F                         
CGCAG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.18, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
CAGGG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.81, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CGUGG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -5.45, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55                                 
CUAUG 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -3.69, deficit  0.25, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.35, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UGUGG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_95237.1,  4 NTs,                 UUUGA,score      -6.21, deficit  2.49, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.21, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35                         
GAAAC 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -3.84, deficit  0.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.60, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGAAG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.55, deficit  0.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  96.13, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
GGAAC 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.91, deficit  0.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.32, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
CUCCG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_53189.1,  5 NTs,                 CUCUG,score      -4.71, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s53                     
CGGGG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.81, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CGUAG 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -4.35, deficit  0.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  99.22, ed 99, 0 cWW-s55                                 
CGCGG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_69459.1,  2 NTs,                CGCGUG,score      -7.74, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.48, ed 99, 1 cWW                                     
ACGCAU 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_18218.2,  6 NTs,             GCCUAGGAC,score      -8.34, deficit  1.03, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.03, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-bif-F-F-s35                     
CGAAAG 1  Matches 32; best is  HL_06569.1,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -6.07, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.63, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
GAAUAC 1  Matches 31; best is  HL_28567.3,  6 NTs,                GAGUAC,score      -5.38, deficit  0.34, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  64.88, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
GAUAAC 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_02906.1,  5 NTs,                UGUAAG,score      -7.41, deficit  0.34, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  64.83, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s35                 
CUUCUG 1  Matches 33; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -9.74, deficit  6.82, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.21, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CAAUAG 1  Matches 30; best is  HL_28567.3,  6 NTs,                GAGUAC,score      -5.38, deficit  0.34, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  64.88, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
GGGAAC 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score     -10.00, deficit  6.57, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.88, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UUCAUG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_00996.1,  5 NTs,                GUCUUC,score      -7.18, deficit  3.33, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.36, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35                 
CCCCAG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_43527.1,  6 NTs,               CGCCGAG,score      -6.12, deficit  0.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  66.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
GGAAGC 1  Matches 26; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -5.43, deficit  3.67, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  61.91, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
GAAAAC 1  Matches 30; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -6.24, deficit  4.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  53.52, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
UGCUAA 1  Matches 28; best is  HL_79299.9,  5 NTs,                CUUCGG,score     -10.08, deficit  8.23, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  18.55, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s53-s55             
CUGGCG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_76360.1,  5 NTs,                GUGUCC,score      -5.56, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
CGAUGG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_05692.1,  3 NTs,                CGUAGG,score      -5.92, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.84, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55                             
UGCGGG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_69459.1,  2 NTs,                CGCGUG,score      -7.72, deficit  1.59, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.69, ed 99, 1 cWW                                     
CUCUUG 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_00996.1,  5 NTs,                GUCUUC,score      -3.92, deficit  0.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  99.22, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35                 
GGGGAC 1  Matches 23; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -6.41, deficit  4.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.70, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
GGGAAC 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score     -10.00, deficit  6.57, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.88, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGAAAG 1  Matches 32; best is  HL_06569.1,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -6.07, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.63, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
GGGAAC 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score     -10.00, deficit  6.57, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.88, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UUACCG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_96776.2,  6 NTs,                AAAAUU,score      -7.97, deficit  2.59, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  41.16, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-F                   
CCAAAG 1  Matches 27; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -5.62, deficit  3.87, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  59.89, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
GUUUUC 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_96283.1,  3 NTs,                CUUAUG,score      -4.01, deficit -0.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  73.01, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUUCUC 1  Matches 33; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score     -10.28, deficit  7.35, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.58, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GAAAGC 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_96776.2,  6 NTs,                AAAAUU,score      -7.04, deficit  1.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.00, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-F                   
CGAAAG 1  Matches 32; best is  HL_06569.1,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -6.07, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.63, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
CGGAAG 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -9.82, deficit  6.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.78, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CAAUGG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_52240.1,  5 NTs,                AAAUUU,score      -5.61, deficit  1.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.84, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
GGGUAC 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_35894.3,  6 NTs,                UAGUAA,score      -4.46, deficit  0.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  63.51, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cSW-s33-F-s35                   
CCAAUG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_96776.2,  6 NTs,                AAAAUU,score      -5.49, deficit  0.11, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.31, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-F                   
AGACAU 1  Matches 28; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -7.02, deficit  5.26, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.45, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
GAAGCC 1  Matches 18; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -7.41, deficit  5.65, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  41.39, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
GUUUUC 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_96283.1,  3 NTs,                CUUAUG,score      -4.01, deficit -0.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  73.01, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUGUUG 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_58912.1,  4 NTs,                CUGUUG,score      -3.06, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-F                           
CUUAUG 1  Matches 30; best is  HL_96283.1,  3 NTs,                CUUAUG,score      -4.45, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
AGAAAU 1  Matches 31; best is  HL_06569.1,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -6.07, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.62, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
GUGCCC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_76360.1,  5 NTs,                GUGUCC,score      -5.49, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
GAAAAC 1  Matches 30; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -6.24, deficit  4.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  53.52, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
UGAGAG 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_04891.1,  6 NTs,                CGAGAG,score      -7.23, deficit  2.15, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  77.36, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
CGAAGG 1  Matches 24; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -4.60, deficit  2.85, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  70.46, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
AGCAAU 1  Matches 30; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -4.91, deficit  3.15, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.32, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
UAGCAA 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_35894.3,  6 NTs,                UAGUAA,score      -4.95, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  58.61, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cSW-s33-F-s35                   
CGAAGG 1  Matches 24; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -4.60, deficit  2.85, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  70.46, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
CAAAAG 1  Matches 32; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -5.41, deficit  3.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  62.06, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
GGUGAC 1  Matches 28; best is  HL_16898.2,  5 NTs,               UGAAAGG,score      -5.75, deficit  0.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.21, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55                 
GAAACC 1  Matches 25; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -6.13, deficit  4.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  54.67, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
CAUUCG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_30541.1,  5 NTs,                CAUUCG,score      -4.39, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F-F                             
CUUAUG 1  Matches 30; best is  HL_96283.1,  3 NTs,                CUUAUG,score      -4.45, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UGAAGA 1  Matches 25; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -6.31, deficit  4.55, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.78, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
GGAGAC 1  Matches 30; best is  HL_04891.1,  6 NTs,                CGAGAG,score      -5.08, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
GUAAUCC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_16845.5,  5 NTs,               CUUAUCG,score      -4.83, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35                 
CGAAAGG 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_16898.2,  5 NTs,               UGAAAGG,score      -6.18, deficit  0.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.70, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55                 
GUUAACC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_06645.1,  6 NTs,              CUUCAACG,score      -7.14, deficit  2.09, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  61.53, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-F-F-s35                     
GGACCGC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_01181.4,  7 NTs,              GCACCGUC,score     -10.03, deficit  3.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.37, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CAAUCGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_59445.1,  7 NTs,               CAAUAGG,score      -6.09, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.20, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-F-s35-s35                   
UGCAAGG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_16898.2,  5 NTs,               UGAAAGG,score      -8.39, deficit  2.91, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.84, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55                 
CAGCGCG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_67216.4,  7 NTs,               CGGCGAG,score      -5.13, deficit  1.91, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.50, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s55-s35-s35         
AUUUCCU 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_02733.4,  6 NTs,               CAUGCCG,score      -8.07, deficit  5.54, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.61, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
GGCUUAC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_90961.1,  4 NTs,               CGCAUAG,score      -5.97, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.73, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55                     
GAUUUCC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_50374.1,  4 NTs,               UAAUUCA,score      -6.97, deficit  1.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  61.41, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
GUGAGUC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_94352.4,  5 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -6.70, deficit  1.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.92, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-F-F                         
GUCUUUC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_69677.1,  5 NTs,               CUUUUUG,score      -6.33, deficit  1.68, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  53.79, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s33-F                           
CGGCGAG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_67216.4,  7 NTs,               CGGCGAG,score      -3.22, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s55-s35-s35         
CUGUUUG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_25183.1,  4 NTs,               CUGUUCG,score      -6.69, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35                                 
UAGUUAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_84050.1,  6 NTs,              CCAGUUAG,score     -12.57, deficit  6.97, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.76, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-cSH-s55                     
GCUCUUC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_86880.4,  5 NTs,               GCUCGUC,score      -8.03, deficit  2.83, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.60, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
CUCAAUG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_86880.4,  5 NTs,               GCUCGUC,score      -8.76, deficit  3.56, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.91, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
CUUUUUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_69677.1,  5 NTs,               CUUUUUG,score      -4.65, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s33-F                           
GGAGAGC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_16898.2,  5 NTs,               UGAAAGG,score      -6.44, deficit  0.96, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  58.33, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55                 
CGCUCGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_94386.1,  6 NTs,               GUGAAGC,score      -8.74, deficit  2.45, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.66, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F-F-s35                         
GAAUCAC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_69774.3,  6 NTs,               GAAACAC,score      -6.45, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.29, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-tSW-s35-s35-s35                 
GGAGCAC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_02361.5,  6 NTs,               UGAACAA,score      -6.72, deficit  1.57, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35                 
GUCGACC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_06645.1,  6 NTs,              CUUCAACG,score      -8.24, deficit  3.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.54, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-F-F-s35                     
GGGUUGC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_37407.1,  5 NTs,               GAGUAUC,score      -5.10, deficit  0.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.74, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35                     
UGGCUGA 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_67216.4,  7 NTs,               CGGCGAG,score      -9.17, deficit  5.95, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.67, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s55-s35-s35         
CGGUAAG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -7.05, deficit  1.04, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  57.51, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
UUCUGUA 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_93573.1,  6 NTs,               CCUUGUG,score      -7.37, deficit  2.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.66, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s33-s35                         
CGAGAAG 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_02361.5,  6 NTs,               UGAACAA,score      -7.29, deficit  2.15, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  77.37, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35                 
GGAAGAC 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_02361.5,  6 NTs,               UGAACAA,score      -6.66, deficit  1.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  84.10, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35                 
GGAGGAC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_04891.1,  6 NTs,                CGAGAG,score      -5.77, deficit  0.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.70, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
AUAUUUU 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_69677.1,  5 NTs,               CUUUUUG,score      -6.35, deficit  1.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  53.57, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s33-F                           
CGAACAG 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_02361.5,  6 NTs,               UGAACAA,score      -5.14, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35                 
CUUCACG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_06645.1,  6 NTs,              CUUCAACG,score      -8.16, deficit  3.11, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  53.78, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-F-F-s35                     
GGAUAAC 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -7.31, deficit  1.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  86.33, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
UGCAAAA 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_12053.1,  5 NTs,               CGCAACG,score      -6.91, deficit  1.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.98, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
CGGAAAG 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -7.05, deficit  1.04, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  57.51, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
UUGAUCA 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_16845.5,  5 NTs,               CUUAUCG,score      -6.00, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  61.51, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35                 
AUGGUUU 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_25183.1,  4 NTs,               CUGUUCG,score      -7.30, deficit  1.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  18.89, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35                                 
CGUAUAG 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_02361.5,  6 NTs,               UGAACAA,score      -6.24, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  88.44, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35                 
GCACAAC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_26055.5,  7 NTs,              GUUUCUAC,score      -8.96, deficit  4.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.09, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
GCAUUCC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_50374.1,  4 NTs,               UAAUUCA,score      -6.97, deficit  1.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  61.41, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
CCAGAUG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_86880.4,  5 NTs,               GCUCGUC,score      -7.49, deficit  2.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.23, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
GGUAAAC 1  Matches 27; best is  HL_02906.1,  5 NTs,                UGUAAG,score      -8.11, deficit  1.03, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  57.53, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s35                 
AUAUUCU 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_50374.1,  4 NTs,               UAAUUCA,score      -6.96, deficit  1.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  61.50, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
CAGAAGG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_94386.1,  6 NTs,               GUGAAGC,score      -9.76, deficit  3.47, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  31.91, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F-F-s35                         
CACUGCG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_32512.6,  7 NTs,               GACUGGC,score      -6.94, deficit  1.58, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.83, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
UAAAAAG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_77081.1,  5 NTs,               UGAAAAG,score      -4.88, deficit  0.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.67, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-cSW-s35-s55-s35             
UAAGCAA 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_69774.3,  6 NTs,               GAAACAC,score      -6.67, deficit  2.41, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.03, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-tSW-s35-s35-s35                 
AGACCAU 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_66171.2,  5 NTs,              CGACACAG,score      -7.54, deficit  4.42, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  49.35, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
AGCACGAU 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_44769.1,  8 NTs,             CGCACGGAG,score      -9.98, deficit  3.50, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.14, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35                 
CUGUAUUG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_17899.1,  8 NTs,              GUGUCUAC,score      -7.64, deficit  3.88, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.95, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-tSW-s35-s35-s35         
UCAUAAAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_03427.1,  7 NTs,             UCUCAUAAG,score     -11.22, deficit  5.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.99, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-s35-s35-s33                     
GAACAAGC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_49223.1,  7 NTs,             GAAAAAAGC,score      -9.45, deficit  3.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.55, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GUGAUUUC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_02811.1,  4 NTs,             AGGGAUUUU,score     -11.42, deficit  3.23, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.54, ed 99, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
UUCAGAUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_92681.4,  7 NTs,              UGAAGAAG,score      -6.68, deficit  3.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.85, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
CUGCUUCG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_46891.2,  8 NTs,              AUGGUUGU,score     -10.28, deficit  3.93, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.51, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
GUUUUACC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_06645.1,  6 NTs,              CUUCAACG,score      -6.22, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.77, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-F-F-s35                     
CGUCCAAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_68742.1,  8 NTs,             CUUGCCAAG,score     -10.98, deficit  4.50, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.43, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
UCUGAUUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_03427.1,  7 NTs,             UCUCAUAAG,score     -11.22, deficit  5.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.99, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-s35-s35-s33                     
GGAACGGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -8.42, deficit  0.83, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.12, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
CUCGAUCG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_93436.1,  7 NTs,             GUUCGAUCC,score     -10.44, deficit  4.77, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  47.74, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F-s35-s35                       
CGCACUAG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_90961.1,  4 NTs,               CGCAUAG,score      -8.78, deficit  3.98, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.35, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55                     
CGGCAGAG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_27335.1,  6 NTs,             ACUGCAGAU,score     -12.90, deficit  5.93, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.88, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35                     
GGUCAAAC 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_63285.1,  8 NTs,              GUUAAAAC,score      -6.15, deficit  1.24, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  49.51, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-F-s35       
UUGGAUUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_68493.4,  7 NTs,              CUGGGAUG,score      -8.36, deficit  3.79, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  41.67, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35         
CGGCAUGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_35888.1,  7 NTs,              AGGCAAUU,score      -8.94, deficit  3.59, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.59, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35-s35               
GAAAUUCC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_50374.1,  4 NTs,               UAAUUCA,score      -9.56, deficit  3.79, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.58, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
AAUGUUGU 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_38646.2,  7 NTs,              GGUAAUGC,score      -7.84, deficit  3.35, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.49, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35             
GGGAUUGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_46891.2,  8 NTs,              AUGGUUGU,score      -8.81, deficit  2.47, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.98, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
CGCCGAAG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_92681.4,  7 NTs,              UGAAGAAG,score      -8.00, deficit  4.42, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.12, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
UGCACCAA 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_66171.2,  5 NTs,              CGACACAG,score      -7.75, deficit  4.64, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  47.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
GAUUGGGC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_59297.1,  6 NTs,              GCUUAGGC,score      -8.07, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.85, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s33-F-F                         
CUCCAAUG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_35888.1,  7 NTs,              AGGCAAUU,score      -7.64, deficit  2.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.07, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35-s35               
UUUAGGCG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score     -10.48, deficit  2.89, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.00, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
UAUAUCGA 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_02906.1,  5 NTs,                UGUAAG,score      -9.83, deficit  2.76, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.41, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s35                 
GGAAACAC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_66171.2,  5 NTs,              CGACACAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.34, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  70.40, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
CGAUGUGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_94651.1,  7 NTs,              CGUUCUAG,score      -8.40, deficit  3.98, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   8.03, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSS-s35-s55                 
CUGGACCG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_68493.4,  7 NTs,              CUGGGAUG,score     -10.45, deficit  5.88, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.69, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35         
CUAAUUUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_84050.1,  6 NTs,              CCAGUUAG,score      -9.22, deficit  3.62, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.12, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cSH-s55                     
CUUAUUUG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_54035.5,  7 NTs,              AUUGAGUU,score      -8.16, deficit  3.89, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.38, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35         
UGAGUGAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_50959.1,  6 NTs,               UGAUGAG,score      -9.44, deficit  4.79, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.19, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
AGGAGGAU 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_44769.1,  8 NTs,             CGCACGGAG,score      -9.98, deficit  3.50, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.04, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35                 
GUAAAGCC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_08002.5,  8 NTs,              GUAGAGUC,score      -6.52, deficit  2.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  59.76, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tWH-F-F-s35-s35                 
CGUAAAGG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -8.62, deficit  1.03, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  89.15, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
CAUCGAAG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_73793.2,  8 NTs,             GAUAAAAGC,score      -8.61, deficit  2.52, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.36, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35 
UGACGAAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_92681.4,  7 NTs,              UGAAGAAG,score      -6.15, deficit  2.56, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.83, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
UCUAAAAA 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_98995.6,  6 NTs,                UACCAA,score      -9.97, deficit  5.78, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.15, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35                     
CAAGCGCG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_27359.1,  5 NTs,           CAGCCUGGUAG,score     -12.57, deficit  4.96, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.58, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s55                     
AAAAUGGU 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -8.96, deficit  1.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  54.04, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
AAGUUUCU 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_81327.2,  5 NTs,            CAGCCGGUAG,score     -11.34, deficit  3.58, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  18.56, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35                         
CGCACUGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -8.66, deficit  1.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  57.13, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
AAAGAUAU 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_86769.2,  7 NTs,              AGGGUCAU,score      -8.66, deficit  1.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  63.82, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSH-s55         
CUAGAACG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_06645.1,  6 NTs,              CUUCAACG,score      -7.25, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.03, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-F-F-s35                     
GUUUUGCC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_33612.1,  6 NTs,               CUUUUGG,score      -9.14, deficit  4.86, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.38, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-cWH-F-F-s55                 
GUAAUUUC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score     -10.03, deficit  2.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.16, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
CGUUACGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_93727.3,  8 NTs,              GGUGGCUC,score      -8.10, deficit  2.31, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  49.82, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
GGCGAAAC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_42733.3,  8 NTs,             CGGCGAAAG,score     -13.25, deficit  4.95, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.66, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35         
UUUAUCUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_73793.2,  8 NTs,             GAUAAAAGC,score     -12.73, deficit  6.63, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.02, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35 
GUUUAAUC 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_92681.4,  7 NTs,              UGAAGAAG,score     -11.59, deficit  8.01, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.13, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
CUCUUUGUG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_14725.1,  9 NTs,             UUCAGUGUG,score     -10.32, deficit  5.89, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.74, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s33-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35     
CAAGAAAAG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_06048.1,  9 NTs,            CAAGAAAGAG,score     -11.41, deficit  3.50, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.93, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35 
GGGACUGAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_44769.1,  8 NTs,             CGCACGGAG,score      -8.75, deficit  2.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.06, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35                 
GUCACUUUC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_14725.1,  9 NTs,             UUCAGUGUG,score     -10.46, deficit  6.02, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.00, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s33-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35     
UUUGUUUUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_86378.1,  7 NTs,             UUUCGUGUG,score      -8.25, deficit  1.84, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.47, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cSH                         
UGAAGGAAA 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_48376.3,  9 NTs,            CGUGUGGAAG,score     -13.73, deficit  6.42, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.42, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GUGUGACUC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_08510.1,  8 NTs,             AUGUGCUUU,score     -10.44, deficit  5.11, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.34, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cSH-s53-s53-F-s55               
UUGUAGCUA 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_67044.1,  8 NTs,             AUGUCGUUU,score      -8.24, deficit  2.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.96, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s33-F-s35               
UAUAACCAA 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_05018.4,  8 NTs,             GAAGACCAC,score     -10.29, deficit  5.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.64, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CGAAGAAAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_42733.3,  8 NTs,             CGGCGAAAG,score      -9.86, deficit  1.56, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.07, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CGCAUUUGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_20743.2,  8 NTs,             GGAUAUGGC,score      -9.47, deficit  4.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.66, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-s55-s35         
CGAAACCAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_05018.4,  8 NTs,             GAAGACCAC,score     -12.18, deficit  7.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  18.98, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CGCCGAGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_44769.1,  8 NTs,             CGCACGGAG,score      -9.78, deficit  3.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  31.52, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35                 
GUUUAAACC 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_41207.1,  9 NTs,             UCUUUAAAA,score     -10.84, deficit  4.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.20, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s53-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s53-s33-s35
GUGCCGGUC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_67044.1,  8 NTs,             AUGUCGUUU,score      -8.24, deficit  2.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.99, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s33-F-s35               
GACACUGGC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_01181.4,  7 NTs,              GCACCGUC,score     -10.45, deficit  4.11, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   9.88, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CGAAUCAAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_78724.1,  8 NTs,             AAAAUCACU,score      -8.80, deficit  2.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.51, ed 99, 2 cWW-s53-s35-s35-s35                     
AAUGCAACU 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_59710.7,  9 NTs,             GCUCAUAAC,score      -8.55, deficit  4.14, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.12, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-bif-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
CUCUGAAUG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_08748.1,  9 NTs,             ACUCAUACU,score      -9.75, deficit  2.81, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.57, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-F-s35-s35
GAAGAUCAC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_05018.4,  8 NTs,             GAAGACCAC,score      -6.80, deficit  1.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  70.94, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CUCAUAAUG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_08748.1,  9 NTs,             ACUCAUACU,score      -9.75, deficit  2.81, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.57, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-F-s35-s35
CAGAAACGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_49223.1,  7 NTs,             GAAAAAAGC,score      -7.46, deficit  1.42, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.43, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CGUUGGCGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_73793.2,  8 NTs,             GAUAAAAGC,score     -10.51, deficit  4.41, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.60, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35 
GUUCGCAUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_37694.1,  9 NTs,             GUUCGAAUC,score      -4.79, deficit  0.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  80.83, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-F-s35   
GGAAACUAC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_17926.4,  9 NTs,             UGUAAGUAA,score     -11.72, deficit  3.64, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.91, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
UAAAAGAAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_49223.1,  7 NTs,             GAAAAAAGC,score     -10.47, deficit  4.43, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.85, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GGGCAGCAC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_17926.4,  9 NTs,             UGUAAGUAA,score      -9.77, deficit  1.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.09, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CGAUGGGAG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_61092.1,  7 NTs,            CAGUUGGGAG,score     -10.18, deficit  4.02, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.03, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F-F                     
GGGGUUCAC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_86769.2,  7 NTs,              AGGGUCAU,score     -13.44, deficit  5.96, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.45, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSH-s55         
CGGGAAAAG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_66703.1,  7 NTs,             UGGCUAAAA,score      -8.97, deficit  2.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.91, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s53-s35         
CUUUCAGUG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_27335.1,  6 NTs,             ACUGCAGAU,score     -10.38, deficit  3.41, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.94, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35                     
GAAUUCAAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_78724.1,  8 NTs,             AAAAUCACU,score      -8.78, deficit  2.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.60, ed 99, 2 cWW-s53-s35-s35-s35                     
CCUGAAACG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_59710.7,  9 NTs,             GCUCAUAAC,score      -7.23, deficit  2.81, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  61.06, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-bif-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
CGAGGUAGG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_20743.2,  8 NTs,             GGAUAUGGC,score     -10.88, deficit  5.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.48, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-s55-s35         
UAGUUGUGA 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_61092.1,  7 NTs,            CAGUUGGGAG,score      -6.64, deficit  0.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.59, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F-F                     
CGGUGCCAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_08510.1,  8 NTs,             AUGUGCUUU,score     -10.30, deficit  4.97, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.37, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cSH-s53-s53-F-s55               
GUUGUCCUC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_68742.1,  8 NTs,             CUUGCCAAG,score      -9.85, deficit  3.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.57, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
CUCAAGUCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_70682.1,  8 NTs,            GUCAAGAUUC,score     -12.24, deficit  6.55, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.87, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s53-s33-s35-s55-s35         
GGUUCAAGC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_72066.1,  8 NTs,             UGUUCAAAG,score      -8.28, deficit  3.31, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  62.48, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55-tWH-s33-F-s35-s35-s35           
CGGAAAUAG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_17926.4,  9 NTs,             UGUAAGUAA,score     -10.16, deficit  2.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.70, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CAUAAACAG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46771.1,  7 NTs,             AUUGAAAAU,score      -8.99, deficit  1.57, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.19, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cSW-tSS-cSS-s55-s35             
CCAACUCUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_01181.4,  7 NTs,              GCACCGUC,score     -11.20, deficit  4.86, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   4.73, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35         
UCAUAACAA 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_63693.1,  8 NTs,            UGCAUAACAA,score      -9.77, deficit  2.01, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  59.60, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
CUCGAACUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_37694.1,  9 NTs,             GUUCGAAUC,score     -12.07, deficit  7.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.22, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-F-s35   
GGAAAUCGC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_20743.2,  8 NTs,             GGAUAUGGC,score      -6.57, deficit  1.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.91, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-s55-s35         
CACAAAUGG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_76406.3,  9 NTs,             GACAGAGAC,score      -8.02, deficit  2.79, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.79, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s33-s53-s53-cWH-s55-s35         
GGUCCUCGC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_59710.7,  9 NTs,             GCUCAUAAC,score     -10.52, deficit  6.11, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.03, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-bif-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
GGUUGGUAC 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_88225.1,  6 NTs,             CAGGGGUAG,score     -12.68, deficit  5.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.03, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s35                     
CUGCUCAGUG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_37846.1,  7 NTs,            CUCCUCGCUG,score     -10.11, deficit  2.45, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.96, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tWW-s35-s35-s53-s55             
CCAUAGCCCG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_24323.1, 10 NTs,            GAAGUGCAAC,score     -10.89, deficit  4.45, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.00, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-tWW-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35 
CGAAGUUUAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_38513.1, 10 NTs,            UCAAGCCUAG,score     -12.01, deficit  5.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.18, ed 99, 3 cWW-s53-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35           
GGUCCCAUGC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_75091.3,  9 NTs,           GUUUGCGGGAC,score     -11.49, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  47.86, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CUUGAAAACG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_30819.1,  8 NTs,            AUUGAGAGCU,score     -11.15, deficit  2.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.37, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s53-s55     
GCCGGAAGCC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_23537.2, 10 NTs,            GUCCCAAGCC,score      -9.83, deficit  6.03, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.35, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s35-s33-s35-s35         
ACGAUAAUUU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_78457.3,  8 NTs,            GUUAAUAUUC,score     -10.57, deficit  6.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   8.09, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tWH-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35         
CGGGAGCCGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_41778.1,  6 NTs,           UAGAGGCCCAG,score     -12.01, deficit  4.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   3.02, ed 99, 5 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s35-tSW                 
UGAAAAGUAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_38513.1, 10 NTs,            UCAAGCCUAG,score     -11.03, deficit  4.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.28, ed 99, 4 cWW-s53-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35           
GUGUGAACUC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_87219.4, 10 NTs,           GAUUAGAUACC,score     -10.91, deficit  3.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.21, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
AGCAUUCAAU 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_48376.3,  9 NTs,            CGUGUGGAAG,score     -11.53, deficit  4.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.93, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CUACGAGAUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_10536.1, 10 NTs,            GUUGGAUAUC,score      -9.98, deficit  4.98, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.39, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s33-F-s35   
CGCCAACGAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_75091.3,  9 NTs,           GUUUGCGGGAC,score     -12.07, deficit  2.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.31, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GGGAAUGUAC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_49213.1, 10 NTs,            GGAAAUGAAC,score     -10.50, deficit  4.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.64, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s33-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35 
CUCCACGAUG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_37846.1,  7 NTs,            CUCCUCGCUG,score      -9.85, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.14, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWW-s35-s35-s53-s55             
UAAGUUCAAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_24323.1, 10 NTs,            GAAGUGCAAC,score      -9.76, deficit  3.32, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  63.85, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-tWW-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35 
GAAAAAACAC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_06048.1,  9 NTs,            CAAGAAAGAG,score      -8.55, deficit  0.63, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.92, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35 
GUCGAGUUUC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_70682.1,  8 NTs,            GUCAAGAUUC,score      -9.12, deficit  3.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  41.99, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s53-s33-s35-s55-s35         
UCCAACAGUA 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_70682.1,  8 NTs,            GUCAAGAUUC,score     -10.81, deficit  5.12, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.20, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tWH-s53-s33-s35-s55-s35         
GACAAAUCCC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_75091.3,  9 NTs,           GUUUGCGGGAC,score     -14.05, deficit  4.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   9.73, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
AGGAAGAAAU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_49213.1, 10 NTs,            GGAAAUGAAC,score     -11.57, deficit  5.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.19, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s33-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35 
UUCGAAAACG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_30819.1,  8 NTs,            AUUGAGAGCU,score     -13.43, deficit  4.58, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.31, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s53-s55     
GUUCAACAUC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_10536.1, 10 NTs,            GUUGGAUAUC,score      -8.30, deficit  3.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.86, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s33-F-s35   
AGAAGCAAGU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_39334.4,  7 NTs,            CGUUGAAAAG,score     -11.54, deficit  5.23, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.13, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s33-s35-s33-cWS-s35-s55 
CGCUUAAGAG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_63693.1,  8 NTs,            UGCAUAACAA,score     -10.04, deficit  2.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.29, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
CUUAAAAAUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_78457.3,  8 NTs,            GUUAAUAUUC,score      -9.01, deficit  4.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.92, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35         
AAUGUACGCU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_26501.1,  8 NTs,            CAGCUACUCG,score     -11.98, deficit  4.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.49, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-F-F                 
CUUUAAUUCG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_32458.2,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -15.06, deficit  7.05, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.35, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35     
CCACUAUAAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_03427.1,  7 NTs,             UCUCAUAAG,score     -15.27, deficit  9.56, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.08, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-s35-s35-s33                     
UCAGCGAGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_51284.1, 10 NTs,            GCAAGGAGAC,score     -11.51, deficit  4.43, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.11, ed 99, 2 cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35           
AGUUGAGGAU 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_75091.3,  9 NTs,           GUUUGCGGGAC,score     -10.35, deficit  0.47, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.08, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CUCGCAUGCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_23537.2, 10 NTs,            GUCCCAAGCC,score     -10.26, deficit  6.46, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.60, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s35-s33-s35-s35         
CGGUUUGAAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_99402.3, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -12.94, deficit  6.49, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  18.08, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35     
GGAGCUUGGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_53499.1,  4 NTs,            CAGCUGGGAG,score     -14.23, deficit  5.57, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   4.76, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-F                               
UUGUGUUCCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_05123.1,  9 NTs,            ACGGGGAGUU,score     -11.37, deficit  3.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.94, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
UAGCACGCAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_41778.1,  6 NTs,           UAGAGGCCCAG,score     -12.36, deficit  4.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.45, ed 99, 4 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s35-tSW                 
CAUGGUCAAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_97733.1,  8 NTs,            CCCGGUCAGG,score     -11.38, deficit  3.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.35, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s55         
CGAUUAGGGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_99402.3, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -12.01, deficit  5.56, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.00, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35     
UAAGAAGCAA 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_06048.1,  9 NTs,            CAAGAAAGAG,score     -10.93, deficit  3.02, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.65, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35 
GCAAAAGAAC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_49213.1, 10 NTs,            GGAAAUGAAC,score      -7.62, deficit  1.34, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.32, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s33-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35 
CGUAAAAGGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_83704.1,  8 NTs,            GGUGAAUGAC,score     -10.64, deficit  2.45, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.74, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-cSS-s35-F           
CACAUAAACG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_96854.1,  9 NTs,            GACUCAACAC,score     -11.63, deficit  4.47, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.03, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s35                 
GGAUAGUCGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_20743.2,  8 NTs,             GGAUAUGGC,score     -13.61, deficit  8.24, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   2.88, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-s55-s35         
CAAAGAGAAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_48962.1, 10 NTs,           CAAAAAUGAAG,score     -11.27, deficit  3.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.13, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-s35-s35-s53         
GGAAGGGCAC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_48376.3,  9 NTs,            CGUGUGGAAG,score     -12.03, deficit  4.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.55, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GUUCUCGGUC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_37846.1,  7 NTs,            CUCCUCGCUG,score      -9.93, deficit  2.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.63, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWW-s35-s35-s53-s55             
GUUAAUCUAUC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_98252.1,  8 NTs,           AUUAUUUAUUU,score     -11.77, deficit  4.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.16, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-s55-tWW-s35-s53-s35-s55-s53     
AAGAGGUUAAU 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_52853.1,  6 NTs,           CAGGCGGUUAG,score     -12.35, deficit  2.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.01, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-s35-s35-F                       
CUUUCUCAUCG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_32458.2,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -11.79, deficit  3.78, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.19, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35     
GGGUGAGUGAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_83704.1,  8 NTs,            GGUGAAUGAC,score     -14.31, deficit  6.12, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.88, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-cSS-s35-F           
UGAACCCGCAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_81820.1, 11 NTs,           UGAAUCCAUAG,score     -14.91, deficit  7.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.16, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tSH-s55-tHW-s35-tHW-s33-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GAAUCAAUUAC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_17956.1,  8 NTs,           UGAUCAAUGAG,score     -12.00, deficit  4.15, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.63, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s55-tHS-s33-F-s35-s35   
UUUAUAAACCA 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_30596.1,  8 NTs,          UCUAUGAUACCA,score     -12.88, deficit  4.50, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.93, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-F-F-s35-F                   
CGUUUCGUCAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_51090.1,  6 NTs,           CAGCUGGUCAG,score     -13.61, deficit  3.45, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   5.62, ed 99, 4 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F                       
GGAUUCAAAGC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_02483.1, 10 NTs,          UGAUCACGAAGG,score     -15.30, deficit  7.52, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.04, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-tWH-cSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
GGAUCUCCAAC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_20891.1, 11 NTs,           CAAUAUCGAAG,score     -10.12, deficit  3.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  31.29, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s53-s33-F-s55-s35-s53-s55       
GGAAGAAUCGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_92304.3, 10 NTs,           CUUAGAAGCAG,score     -12.83, deficit  8.43, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.61, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-cSW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGGUAAAAUGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_87219.4, 10 NTs,           GAUUAGAUACC,score     -13.10, deficit  5.57, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.21, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CUUUAAAGACG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_87219.4, 10 NTs,           GAUUAGAUACC,score     -10.42, deficit  2.88, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.21, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GCAGUAGCAUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_19958.1,  8 NTs,           GUAGUGGUAUC,score     -14.13, deficit  6.79, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.71, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-cWS-s35-s35-s35     
GUGUACAUGUC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_04171.2, 10 NTs,           AUGAUAUGGUU,score     -13.76, deficit  6.75, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.87, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35
UGAUCACAAGA 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_02483.1, 10 NTs,          UGAUCACGAAGG,score     -15.26, deficit  7.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  47.35, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55-tWH-cSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
GGAGCAUGUGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_67265.4, 10 NTs,           UUUGAUCCUGG,score     -14.47, deficit  7.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.71, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
UUUGCUAACCA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_32458.2,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -12.38, deficit  4.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.62, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35     
GUUCUUAUUUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_98252.1,  8 NTs,           AUUAUUUAUUU,score     -10.67, deficit  3.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.07, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-s55-tWW-s35-s53-s35-s55-s53     
GAAGACAAUGC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_49992.1, 10 NTs,           GAUCAGAAUGC,score     -13.31, deficit  5.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.73, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
AGUCAGGCAAU 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_70505.1, 11 NTs,          GAUCAGCCAUGC,score     -11.68, deficit  4.85, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.75, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWW-s35-s35-s35-F-s55-s35
UGAUGAAAAGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_49992.1, 10 NTs,           GAUCAGAAUGC,score     -17.18, deficit  9.60, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   6.53, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GAAAUUGUCAC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_51090.1,  6 NTs,           CAGCUGGUCAG,score     -12.43, deficit  2.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  31.15, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F                       
GGUUAUUGAGC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_50622.6, 11 NTs,           CCUUGAGGUGG,score     -11.82, deficit  2.67, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.20, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35 
GCGAUAACCCC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_30596.1,  8 NTs,          UCUAUGAUACCA,score     -14.63, deficit  6.25, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   3.91, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-F-F-s35-F                   
CUAGCUUGCCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_86843.1,  7 NTs,           AAAGCGGUUAU,score     -10.28, deficit  1.26, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   2.67, ed 99, 5 cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s35-s35-s35             
CGUUAAAUCGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_87219.4, 10 NTs,           GAUUAGAUACC,score     -10.84, deficit  3.31, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.49, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CAGCUUUGUGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_19239.1,  8 NTs,           CAGCCUGGUAG,score     -10.73, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.32, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-s35-F-F-F-F                     
CGGGAAGAUAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_72714.2, 11 NTs,          UAGGGAACGGGA,score     -13.18, deficit  5.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.94, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GAUUAUAAAAC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_43613.3,  7 NTs,           UUUAUUAAAAA,score      -9.60, deficit  3.09, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.72, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s53-s35         
UGUCAUAAGAA 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_49992.1, 10 NTs,           GAUCAGAAUGC,score      -9.74, deficit  2.16, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.14, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GCCAAGGAAAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_51284.1, 10 NTs,            GCAAGGAGAC,score     -14.16, deficit  7.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.11, ed 99, 2 cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35           
GGAAAGAUGAC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_98248.1, 10 NTs,           GUAACUAUGAC,score      -9.96, deficit  4.60, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.02, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s33-s55-s55-tHW-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s35
GUAAAAAGCUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_92304.3, 10 NTs,           CUUAGAAGCAG,score     -14.31, deficit  9.90, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   8.02, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cSW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
AUUAAAGGAUU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_36095.1,  9 NTs,           UUGAUAUGAUG,score     -13.02, deficit  5.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  18.35, ed 99, 3 cWW-s53-s55-s33-F-F-s55                 
UAGCUCUUCAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_51090.1,  6 NTs,           CAGCUGGUCAG,score     -12.77, deficit  2.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  47.40, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F                       
GGAUUAAAAAC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_49992.1, 10 NTs,           GAUCAGAAUGC,score     -10.29, deficit  2.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  47.82, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGUAGAUCUGC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_75091.3,  9 NTs,           GUUUGCGGGAC,score     -13.29, deficit  3.41, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.93, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
UUCUCAAUCUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_75091.3,  9 NTs,           GUUUGCGGGAC,score     -16.62, deficit  6.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.68, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GUGAAGCUUUC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_53037.1,  8 NTs,           CUAUGGCUAUG,score     -11.90, deficit  3.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   6.03, ed 99, 4 cWW-F-s35-s35-F-s55                     
GUUCCCUAAUC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_56500.1,  9 NTs,           GUUUUGUAAUC,score     -10.20, deficit  2.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.84, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s55-cSH-s35         
GUUCAUGAAUC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_91503.2,  9 NTs,           GUUCGUGGAGC,score     -10.54, deficit  3.56, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.97, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s33-s35             
CUUCGCAGUCCG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_25466.1, 11 NTs,          CAUUGCACUCCG,score     -12.08, deficit  4.83, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.50, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-F-s35-F-F           
CGAACUUUUCAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_19162.2, 12 NTs,          GGAACACUAUAC,score     -13.93, deficit  5.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   3.17, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-F-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGAUACAAUCAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_17956.1,  8 NTs,           UGAUCAAUGAG,score     -15.36, deficit  7.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  18.34, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s55-tHS-s33-F-s35-s35   
CGAAGCAAUGAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_26772.1, 11 NTs,          CGAAUCCAUAAG,score     -14.14, deficit  4.41, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.82, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s55-s33-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35
UGAGAUAAAUAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_81820.1, 11 NTs,           UGAAUCCAUAG,score     -15.06, deficit  7.32, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  18.40, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tSH-s55-tHW-s35-tHW-s33-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
UUGUACUUUAUA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_08291.1, 11 NTs,          CUGACCGAUAUG,score     -13.62, deficit  6.09, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   5.34, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F
GAAAUGUUAGAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_96423.1, 10 NTs,          UAUCGGUUAGAG,score     -14.50, deficit  5.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.70, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-s35
CGAAAUUCCAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_88982.1,  8 NTs,          CAAAAUAACAAG,score     -11.25, deficit  4.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.15, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s35-s35             
GGGCACUUGAAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_19162.2, 12 NTs,          GGAACACUAUAC,score     -15.41, deficit  6.87, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.64, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-F-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GUUAAUGAAACC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_30596.1,  8 NTs,          UCUAUGAUACCA,score     -14.09, deficit  5.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   6.78, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-F-F-s35-F                   
UUCUUGGUACCA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_30596.1,  8 NTs,          UCUAUGAUACCA,score     -13.21, deficit  4.83, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.20, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-F-F-s35-F                   
GUGAGAACGGCC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_72714.2, 11 NTs,          UAGGGAACGGGA,score     -13.47, deficit  5.49, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.38, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GUGAUAAUGAUC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_36095.1,  9 NTs,           UUGAUAUGAUG,score     -15.61, deficit  8.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.52, ed 99, 1 cWW-s53-s55-s33-F-F-s55                 
GGUAAAAUGCAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_19162.2, 12 NTs,          GGAACACUAUAC,score     -13.29, deficit  4.75, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   6.74, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-F-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGAUUAAUACAC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_07268.1, 11 NTs,          CAAUUUAUACAG,score     -10.83, deficit  2.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  49.77, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s53-s53-s35-s35 
CGUAGCACGCGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_25466.1, 11 NTs,          CAUUGCACUCCG,score     -13.18, deficit  5.93, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   3.42, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-F-s35-F-F           
CUGUCAAAACCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_17086.2, 13 NTs,         AAUGUAAAUACCU,score     -19.37, deficit  8.41, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   9.56, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGCAACCUAAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_19162.2, 12 NTs,          GGAACACUAUAC,score     -13.93, deficit  5.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.87, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-F-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GUAAGGAAGGCC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_72714.2, 11 NTs,          UAGGGAACGGGA,score     -11.13, deficit  3.15, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.89, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GUUUGUAGGUCC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_25466.1, 11 NTs,          CAUUGCACUCCG,score     -13.30, deficit  6.05, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   2.79, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-F-s35-F-F           
GCUUAAUGAACC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_30596.1,  8 NTs,          UCUAUGAUACCA,score     -14.09, deficit  5.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   6.78, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-F-F-s35-F                   
GGAUGCUGACAAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_86109.1, 12 NTs,         GGGCGGUGGGAGC,score     -13.92, deficit  7.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   4.09, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35
AGGAUAUGUAAGU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_86109.1, 12 NTs,         GGGCGGUGGGAGC,score     -14.20, deficit  7.45, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.73, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35
CUUGAAGAUCACG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_19870.4, 11 NTs,         CUAAAAGGUAACG,score     -10.54, deficit  3.35, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.23, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s53-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGAAACGAAAAGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_19870.4, 11 NTs,         CUAAAAGGUAACG,score     -14.92, deficit  7.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.36, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s53-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGGAAAGGAAAGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_86109.1, 12 NTs,         GGGCGGUGGGAGC,score     -16.66, deficit  9.92, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   5.39, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35
GAAUUGUAAAAGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_86109.1, 12 NTs,         GGGCGGUGGGAGC,score     -16.25, deficit  9.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.46, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35
GAAAGACAGAAGAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_07432.1, 11 NTs,        CUCAGCAGGUAGAG,score     -14.89, deficit  3.87, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   5.65, ed 99, 5 cWW-s35-s55-cWS-s35-cSH-s35-s35         
CUUUAAGUAAAAUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_60326.1,  9 NTs,         GUUUACCAAAAUC,score     -15.32, deficit  7.49, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   8.85, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s33-s35-s35 
UGUGUACUGAUGAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_98870.1, 12 NTs,     CGUAGGCUACAGAGAAG,score     -15.88, deficit  7.94, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   3.40, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s55-s55-tWW-s35-F-s35-s53-s55-s35-s35
GGAAGCCGAGGAAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_28843.1, 14 NTs,       UGAAGGCAGAAGUAA,score     -15.05, deficit  0.92, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.54, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s35-s35
GGCAACGCGAAAAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_42671.1, 11 NTs,         AGCACGUGAAAUU,score     -18.61, deficit  9.87, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   5.64, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-F-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s35           
CUUGAAAAAUCAUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_85984.1, 14 NTs,        UUUCAGAGAUGAGA,score     -13.69, deficit  3.45, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   8.49, ed 99, 5 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-F-s35-s35
GGUCCGGUGGUAAAGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_30585.1, 16 NTs,     AGUCGCGUGAUAAAUGU,score     -19.01, deficit  6.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.25, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSS-s35-cSW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GUAACCGUAAGGAAUAUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_82782.1, 18 NTs,   CUGACCGAAAGGCGUGAUG,score     -20.61, deficit  6.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.73, ed 99, 5 cWW-s55-s35-tSH-s33-s55-tHS-s33-F-s55-F-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35
4	100.0000	 87.3333	 79.5556	4
5	100.0000	 88.4444	 49.7778	23
6	100.0000	 87.1111	 50.8889	60
7	 99.3333	 54.4444	 16.4444	51
8	 99.3333	 26.8889	  3.7778	46
9	 98.2222	 18.0000	  1.3333	68
10	 95.3333	  7.5556	  0.0000	41
11	 82.8889	  3.5556	  0.0000	42
12	 42.4444	  0.4444	  0.0000	23
13	 17.3333	  0.6667	  0.0000	12
14	  6.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	8
15	  0.8889	  0.0000	  0.0000	8
16	  2.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	4
17	  0.2222	  0.0000	  0.0000	4
18	  0.8889	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
19	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
20	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	2
21	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	0
22	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	2
23	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	0
24	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
25	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
26	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
27	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	0





Model HL_00317.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  50.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSS-s35-s35-s35-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGGCCUUUCUUAAAAAAAAA
Model HL_01925.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-cHW-cWH-s35-cHW-cWH-s53-s33-cWH-cHW-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-s33-cHW-cWH-tSH-s35-cWH-s53-s33-cHW-s35-s33-s35, sequence CGAAGGGACGGUGCGGAGAGGAGAG
Model HL_03603.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AUUUUGUUGGUUUCU
Model HL_06137.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWH-s33-s33-cHW-cWH-s35-cHW-cWH-cWH-s35-cWH-s33-s55-s55-cHW-s33-cWH-s53-s35-s33-cWH-s53-s35-s33-s55, sequence UGUGGAAGGAGUGGCUGGGUUG
Model HL_07579.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.89%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UACUUAUUUCCUUUGA
Model HL_12710.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH-s55-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAAGCGUAAUAGCUC
Model HL_46465.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s33-cHW-s55-s35-cWH-s53-s35-cHW-cWH-s53-s35-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-tWW-F-s55-cWH-s35-cWH-s35-tWW-s35-tHH-s53-s35-s53-tSW-s55-s55-s33-cSH-s35-s35, sequence AGGAAGGAUUGGUAUGUGGUAUAU
Model HL_56677.4  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.36%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-tWH-s35-tSH-s55-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-tHW-s33-tSW-s35-s35-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35, sequence CUGAACGCAUCUAAG
Model HL_59564.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN 100.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSS-s35-cSS-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGGCCUUUCUUAAAAAAAAA
Model HL_74088.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWH-s33-s33-cHW-cWH-s53-s35-cHW-cWH-s53-cWH-s35-cWH-s33-tSW-s55-s55-cHW-s33-cWH-s35-s33-cWH-F-s35-s33-s55-F, sequence UGUGGAAGGAGUGGCUGGGUUG
Model HL_79564.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-cHW-cWH-tSH-s35-cHW-cWH-s53-s33-cWH-cHW-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-s33-cHW-cWH-tSH-s35-cWH-s53-s33-s33-cHW-s35-s33-s35, sequence CGAAGGAGAGGAGAGGAAGAGGAGAG
Model HL_82866.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  85.71%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s33-s55-s35, sequence CAACUUAGGAUUUUAGG
Model HL_92488.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.65%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s55-s35-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s35-F-s35, sequence GAAACCGCCGAUAUGC
Model HL_12773.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.37%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s55-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUAUUGCAGUACCUC
Model HL_20751.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.15%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tHW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s55, sequence CAGGGGAGGAAUCG
Model HL_30585.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.45%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSS-s35-cSW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AGUCGCGUGAUAAAUGU
Model HL_38011.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-F-F-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUUAGAAGCAGCC
Model HL_58446.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-tSW-s35-s53-F-F-s35-s35-s35, sequence GACCUAGAUCACCC
Model HL_68863.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.64%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F, sequence AGGUGGGGUUUAU
Model HL_81205.2  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.75%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-F-F-s35, sequence CACUGAGACACGGG
Model HL_90257.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-F-s35-s35, sequence CGAAAAAAUUGGAAGUAG
Model HL_93221.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.70%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-F-s35-s35-s35, sequence GACCUAGAUCACCC
Model HL_12870.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.39%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tHW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s53-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUCCUUGGGAAAC
Model HL_82782.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  60.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-tSH-s33-s55-tHS-s33-F-s55-F-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CUGACCGAAAGGCGUGAUG
Model HL_85984.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-F-s35-s35, sequence UUUCAGAGAUGAGA
Model HL_98870.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s55-s55-tWW-s35-F-s35-s53-s55-s35-s35, sequence CGUAGGCUACAGAGAAG
Model HL_08602.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cSS-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-cSS-s35-s55, sequence CAAUCCGCUCUAG
Model HL_12571.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.11%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s55-cWS-s35-tSW-s35-s33-F-F-s35, sequence CGAGCCUGGUCAAAG
Model HL_52657.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  75.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-tSH-s33-s55-bif-s35-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGGAUCAGUCACCCAAG
Model HL_93650.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.14%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35, sequence CAUCCGAGUUGCAAG
Model HL_42211.1  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.58%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-F-F-F-F-s35, sequence UGGAAUUGGUAGACA
Model HL_58539.1  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  64.71%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-s55-tWS-tHW-F-F-s55-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUAAAUUGGGCACUUG
Model HL_58733.1  matched a sequence   5 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.07%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s33-s35-s55-s35-F-F-F-F-s35-s35, sequence CGGAGCGGCUGAAG
Model HL_89082.1  matched a sequence   5 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.90%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAGAAUACGACC
Model HL_07432.1  matched a sequence   6 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.36%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWS-s35-cSH-s35-s35, sequence CUCAGCAGGUAGAG
Model HL_28843.1  matched a sequence   6 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.10%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s35-s35, sequence UGAAGGCAGAAGUAA
Model HL_31581.4  matched a sequence   6 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.95%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s55-s35, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_35978.6  matched a sequence   6 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.00%,  12 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_94032.1  matched a sequence   6 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.06%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UAGUCUCUUUCG
Model HL_20714.1  matched a sequence   7 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.93%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AAUGGGAUGUCGU
Model HL_10751.2  matched a sequence   9 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.62%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F-s33, sequence CAGCCUGGUAG
Model HL_22443.1  matched a sequence  10 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-F, sequence CCUGAGAAACGG
Model HL_43488.1  matched a sequence  10 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-F-F-s35, sequence AACGCUUGCGUU
Model HL_96423.1  matched a sequence  10 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.04%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-s35, sequence UAUCGGUUAGAG
Model HL_60326.1  matched a sequence  11 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.04%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s33-s35-s35, sequence GUUUACCAAAAUC
Model HL_25466.1  matched a sequence  12 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-F-s35-F-F, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_70505.1  matched a sequence  12 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.66%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWW-s35-s35-s35-F-s55-s35, sequence GAUCAGCCAUGC
Model HL_07268.1  matched a sequence  13 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s53-s53-s35-s35, sequence CAAUUUAUACAG
Model HL_86109.1  matched a sequence  13 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.30%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35, sequence GGGCGGUGGGAGC
Model HL_42671.1  matched a sequence  14 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.24%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-F-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s35, sequence AGCACGUGAAAUU
Model HL_49873.1  matched a sequence  14 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-cWS-s35-cWS-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGAAUCGGUAGAC
Model HL_72419.1  matched a sequence  14 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.12%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUCCCAACGAG
Model HL_22576.1  matched a sequence  15 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s55-F-s55-s35-F-s35, sequence CCUAAUUAGUGG
Model HL_20891.1  matched a sequence  18 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.37%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s53-s33-F-s55-s35-s53-s55, sequence CAAUAUCGAAG
Model HL_30596.1  matched a sequence  18 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F-F-s35-F, sequence UCUAUGAUACCA
Model HL_03847.1  matched a sequence  19 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.67%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUGGCGGUC
Model HL_19870.4  matched a sequence  19 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.18%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s53-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CUAAAAGGUAACG
Model HL_88982.1  matched a sequence  22 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s35-s35, sequence CAAAAUAACAAG
Model HL_19162.2  matched a sequence  23 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-F-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGAACACUAUAC
Model HL_19398.1  matched a sequence  23 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-cWS-s35-cSH-s35, sequence CAAGCGGUAAG
Model HL_36421.4  matched a sequence  23 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AGUUCAUAU
Model HL_11805.2  matched a sequence  24 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s53-F-s35-s35, sequence GGUCGGACAUC
Model HL_38513.1  matched a sequence  24 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.34%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UCAAGCCUAG
Model HL_52853.1  matched a sequence  24 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-s35-F, sequence CAGGCGGUUAG
Model HL_90620.1  matched a sequence  24 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-cSW-cSH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AACCGUAAAAU
Model HL_98885.3  matched a sequence  24 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAGUGCACAC
Model HL_35188.1  matched a sequence  25 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-s33-F, sequence CAGCCUGGGAG
Model HL_17086.2  matched a sequence  26 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AAUGUAAAUACCU
Model HL_86843.1  matched a sequence  26 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence AAAGCGGUUAU
Model HL_26501.1  matched a sequence  27 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-F-F, sequence CAGCUACUCG
Model HL_92304.3  matched a sequence  27 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.01%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CUUAGAAGCAG
Model HL_08291.1  matched a sequence  28 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F, sequence CUGACCGAUAUG
Model HL_18808.1  matched a sequence  28 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35, sequence CAAUUGGAUAG
Model HL_56500.1  matched a sequence  28 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s55-cSH-s35, sequence GUUUUGUAAUC
Model HL_98252.1  matched a sequence  29 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s55-tWW-s35-s53-s35-s55-s53, sequence AUUAUUUAUUU
Model HL_72451.4  matched a sequence  30 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.87%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35-s35, sequence GGAACAAC
Model HL_19239.1  matched a sequence  32 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.72%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGCCUGGUAG
Model HL_32255.1  matched a sequence  32 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s33-cWW-F-cSS-s53-s55-s35, sequence UUUUUUAAUG
Model HL_94607.1  matched a sequence  32 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s53, sequence GGCUCAUAACC
Model HL_98248.1  matched a sequence  32 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.71%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s55-s55-tHW-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s35, sequence GUAACUAUGAC
Model HL_02483.1  matched a sequence  33 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-tWH-cSH-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAUCACGAAGG
Model HL_19958.1  matched a sequence  33 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-cWS-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUAGUGGUAUC
Model HL_51284.1  matched a sequence  33 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCAAGGAGAC
Model HL_81820.1  matched a sequence  33 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.16%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s55-tHW-s35-tHW-s33-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAAUCCAUAG
Model HL_51090.1  matched a sequence  34 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F, sequence CAGCUGGUCAG
Model HL_53037.1  matched a sequence  37 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-s35-s35-F-s55, sequence CUAUGGCUAUG
Model HL_10536.1  matched a sequence  38 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s33-F-s35, sequence GUUGGAUAUC
Model HL_86378.1  matched a sequence  39 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSH, sequence UUUCGUGUG
Model HL_08510.1  matched a sequence  40 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH-s53-s53-F-s55, sequence AUGUGCUUU
Model HL_48962.1  matched a sequence  41 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-s35-s35-s53, sequence CAAAAAUGAAG
Model HL_29487.1  matched a sequence  42 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.79%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-s35-s55, sequence CUGAUG
Model HL_37846.1  matched a sequence  42 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWW-s35-s35-s53-s55, sequence CUCCUCGCUG
Model HL_96854.1  matched a sequence  44 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s35, sequence GACUCAACAC
Model HL_02811.1  matched a sequence  46 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence AGGGAUUUU
Model HL_14725.1  matched a sequence  46 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s33-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUCAGUGUG
Model HL_33239.14 matched a sequence  46 times, TP  96.30%, TN  96.01%, 108 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUCGAUUC
Model HL_97733.1  matched a sequence  46 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s55, sequence CCCGGUCAGG
Model HL_23537.2  matched a sequence  47 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s35-s33-s35-s35, sequence GUCCCAAGCC
Model HL_67216.4  matched a sequence  47 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.82%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence CGGCGAG
Model HL_58200.1  matched a sequence  49 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s55, sequence CCUCACACG
Model HL_78061.2  matched a sequence  49 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s33, sequence CUGCAACCCG
Model HL_24323.1  matched a sequence  50 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s33-tWW-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAGUGCAAC
Model HL_33172.1  matched a sequence  51 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55-F, sequence CCUUUCACG
Model HL_41778.1  matched a sequence  51 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s35-tSW, sequence UAGAGGCCCAG
Model HL_63693.1  matched a sequence  51 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGCAUAACAA
Model HL_50622.6  matched a sequence  52 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CCUUGAGGUGG
Model HL_23481.4  matched a sequence  53 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-F-s35, sequence GAAACAUC
Model HL_36095.1  matched a sequence  53 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-s55-s33-F-F-s55, sequence UUGAUAUGAUG
Model HL_50537.2  matched a sequence  54 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-F-F-s35-s35, sequence ACUGUUAAU
Model HL_91503.2  matched a sequence  55 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s33-s35, sequence GUUCGUGGAGC
Model HL_05123.1  matched a sequence  56 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACGGGGAGUU
Model HL_17956.1  matched a sequence  56 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s55-tHS-s33-F-s35-s35, sequence UGAUCAAUGAG
Model HL_26772.1  matched a sequence  56 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s55-s33-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGAAUCCAUAAG
Model HL_36207.1  matched a sequence  56 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s35-s35-s33-s55, sequence CCUUUCACG
Model HL_92681.4  matched a sequence  56 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAAGAAG
Model HL_15968.1  matched a sequence  57 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35-s53-F, sequence CAGUCGGUAG
Model HL_41851.1  matched a sequence  57 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s33-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence CCUUACGAG
Model HL_67265.4  matched a sequence  58 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   8 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUUGAUCCUGG
Model HL_72714.2  matched a sequence  58 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.93%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UAGGGAACGGGA
Model HL_73235.1  matched a sequence  58 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s55, sequence CAGCACUUUG
Model HL_59710.7  matched a sequence  59 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,  32 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUCAUAAC
Model HL_09712.1  matched a sequence  60 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F, sequence UUCUGCGG
Model HL_53499.1  matched a sequence  60 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-F, sequence CAGCUGGGAG
Model HL_18785.1  matched a sequence  61 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.83%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35, sequence UAAGGG
Model HL_43613.3  matched a sequence  61 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s53-s35, sequence UUUAUUAAAAA
Model HL_59445.1  matched a sequence  62 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.84%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F-s35-s35, sequence CAAUAGG
Model HL_43074.14 matched a sequence  63 times, TP  97.44%, TN  95.97%, 273 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAAAA
Model HL_80705.1  matched a sequence  63 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWW-s35-s35-s53-s55, sequence CUCCUCGCG
Model HL_91131.1  matched a sequence  63 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUUUGGAC
Model HL_04171.2  matched a sequence  64 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35, sequence AUGAUAUGGUU
Model HL_27359.1  matched a sequence  64 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s55, sequence CAGCCUGGUAG
Model HL_31286.3  matched a sequence  64 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUUGGGGAAAG
Model HL_32458.2  matched a sequence  64 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGUUCGAAUCC
Model HL_70682.1  matched a sequence  66 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s53-s33-s35-s55-s35, sequence GUCAAGAUUC
Model HL_73051.1  matched a sequence  67 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s33-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAGGAGGUC
Model HL_02733.4  matched a sequence  68 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence CAUGCCG
Model HL_49213.1  matched a sequence  68 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s33-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGAAAUGAAC
Model HL_93436.1  matched a sequence  69 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.84%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-s35-s35, sequence GUUCGAUCC
Model HL_73266.3  matched a sequence  70 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,  12 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-cSW-cSH-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACCGUAAAU
Model HL_35888.1  matched a sequence  71 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.19%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35-s35, sequence AGGCAAUU
Model HL_44911.1  matched a sequence  71 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.19%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-F-F, sequence AGGCAAUU
Model HL_01008.4  matched a sequence  72 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-F, sequence GAUCAC
Model HL_37694.1  matched a sequence  72 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-F-s35, sequence GUUCGAAUC
Model HL_41207.1  matched a sequence  72 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s53-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s53-s33-s35, sequence UCUUUAAAA
Model HL_67044.1  matched a sequence  72 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s33-F-s35, sequence AUGUCGUUU
Model HL_90642.4  matched a sequence  73 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence GUGAAGAUGC
Model HL_36552.1  matched a sequence  74 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-F-s55-F, sequence CCUCCUAAG
Model HL_55046.1  matched a sequence  74 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s55, sequence GUUUAUC
Model HL_97049.1  matched a sequence  74 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-cSH, sequence CAGUCGGUAG
Model HL_30819.1  matched a sequence  75 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s53-s55, sequence AUUGAGAGCU
Model HL_39334.4  matched a sequence  75 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s33-s35-s33-cWS-s35-s55, sequence CGUUGAAAAG
Model HL_55511.1  matched a sequence  75 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s53, sequence UAACGGUAG
Model HL_49992.1  matched a sequence  76 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAUCAGAAUGC
Model HL_79299.9  matched a sequence  76 times, TP  98.08%, TN  95.66%,  52 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s53-s55, sequence CUUCGG
Model HL_23090.1  matched a sequence  77 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGACAUAAG
Model HL_48810.1  matched a sequence  77 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-s35-F, sequence CAGCUGGUUAG
Model HL_68478.1  matched a sequence  78 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-s35, sequence GCUUGC
Model HL_06048.1  matched a sequence  79 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35, sequence CAAGAAAGAG
Model HL_49223.1  matched a sequence  79 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAAAAAGC
Model HL_34135.1  matched a sequence  80 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUUUUGAUA
Model HL_44769.1  matched a sequence  80 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.74%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGCACGGAG
Model HL_78457.3  matched a sequence  80 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUAAUAUUC
Model HL_78724.1  matched a sequence  80 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-s35-s35-s35, sequence AAAAUCACU
Model HL_81327.2  matched a sequence  80 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35, sequence CAGCCGGUAG
Model HL_03427.1  matched a sequence  81 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.93%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-s35-s33, sequence UCUCAUAAG
Model HL_23219.1  matched a sequence  81 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-cSH-s55-cWH-s35-s53-s55, sequence CGUUAAUG
Model HL_38646.2  matched a sequence  81 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGUAAUGC
Model HL_30937.1  matched a sequence  82 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUAACGC
Model HL_32512.6  matched a sequence  83 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,  16 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GACUGGC
Model HL_68742.1  matched a sequence  83 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.78%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CUUGCCAAG
Model HL_48376.3  matched a sequence  84 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGUGUGGAAG
Model HL_49816.1  matched a sequence  84 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s55-s33, sequence GAAAGACC
Model HL_01187.1  matched a sequence  85 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.10%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-s35, sequence GAAUUAAC
Model HL_17926.4  matched a sequence  85 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGUAAGUAA
Model HL_46891.2  matched a sequence  86 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,  11 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AUGGUUGU
Model HL_49194.1  matched a sequence  86 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.93%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGACGAUC
Model HL_76406.3  matched a sequence  86 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s53-s53-cWH-s55-s35, sequence GACAGAGAC
Model HL_72066.1  matched a sequence  87 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-tWH-s33-F-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGUUCAAAG
Model HL_99402.3  matched a sequence  87 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGAUUACCUG
Model HL_08002.5  matched a sequence  88 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  14 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-F-F-s35-s35, sequence GUAGAGUC
Model HL_61092.1  matched a sequence  88 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   8 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F-F, sequence CAGUUGGGAG
Model HL_87219.4  matched a sequence  89 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,  11 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAUUAGAUACC
Model HL_05832.1  matched a sequence  90 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55-s35, sequence GCGAAAGAC
Model HL_27757.1  matched a sequence  90 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-F, sequence CGGAAAGG
Model HL_35010.1  matched a sequence  90 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-cSH-s35-s35, sequence CUUGCAAAG
Model HL_05018.4  matched a sequence  91 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAGACCAC
Model HL_26055.5  matched a sequence  91 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  15 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUUCUAC
Model HL_06920.1  matched a sequence  92 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUUCUAC
Model HL_08748.1  matched a sequence  92 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-F-s35-s35, sequence ACUCAUACU
Model HL_17899.1  matched a sequence  92 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-tSW-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUGUCUAC
Model HL_27335.1  matched a sequence  92 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35, sequence ACUGCAGAU
Model HL_83225.1  matched a sequence  92 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CGUAUUG
Model HL_06645.1  matched a sequence  93 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-F-F-s35, sequence CUUCAACG
Model HL_43610.4  matched a sequence  93 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35, sequence GGAGACC
Model HL_93727.3  matched a sequence  93 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  22 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGUGGCUC
Model HL_20743.2  matched a sequence  94 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-s55-s35, sequence GGAUAUGGC
Model HL_48636.1  matched a sequence  94 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-F-cWH-s55, sequence UGUGAGAGG
Model HL_35491.2  matched a sequence  95 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence GAAACAC
Model HL_63285.1  matched a sequence  95 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-F-s35, sequence GUUAAAAC
Model HL_67052.1  matched a sequence  95 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-bif-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACUCUAAAU
Model HL_83704.1  matched a sequence  95 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-cSS-s35-F, sequence GGUGAAUGAC
Model HL_90197.1  matched a sequence  95 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.69%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35, sequence UGUAGG
Model HL_96487.1  matched a sequence  95 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.42%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CAUGUAG
Model HL_66171.2  matched a sequence  96 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35, sequence CGACACAG
Model HL_66703.1  matched a sequence  96 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s53-s35, sequence UGGCUAAAA
Model HL_34974.1  matched a sequence  97 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55-s55, sequence CUUCGG
Model HL_69677.1  matched a sequence  97 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.85%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-F, sequence CUUUUUG
Model HL_73793.2  matched a sequence  97 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAUAAAAGC
Model HL_88858.1  matched a sequence  98 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-bif-s35-tSW-s55-s35, sequence CCUGAUAAG
Model HL_94651.1  matched a sequence  98 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSS-s35-s55, sequence CGUUCUAG
Model HL_67205.1  matched a sequence  99 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.63%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-s53, sequence CAUUCG
Model HL_88225.1  matched a sequence  99 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s35, sequence CAGGGGUAG
Model HL_93551.1  matched a sequence  99 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s53-F-s35-s35-s55, sequence CAUGGACG
Model HL_53760.2  matched a sequence 100 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  10 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-s33-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGUAAGUUC
Model HL_59297.1  matched a sequence 101 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.57%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-F-F, sequence GCUUAGGC
Model HL_93229.1  matched a sequence 101 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CCUUGAG
Model HL_15942.4  matched a sequence 103 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.34%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35, sequence UUUAGG
Model HL_27747.3  matched a sequence 103 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.86%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s53-s55-cSH, sequence AGAAAUU
Model HL_46771.1  matched a sequence 103 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-tSS-cSS-s55-s35, sequence AUUGAAAAU
Model HL_50374.1  matched a sequence 103 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence UAAUUCA
Model HL_54035.5  matched a sequence 103 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence AUUGAGUU
Model HL_28085.1  matched a sequence 104 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.72%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-F, sequence CAGUAAAUG
Model HL_18495.1  matched a sequence 105 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACUGCAGAU
Model HL_93573.1  matched a sequence 105 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.52%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35, sequence CCUUGUG
Model HL_01181.4  matched a sequence 106 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCACCGUC
Model HL_01472.3  matched a sequence 106 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSW-F-s55-s53, sequence GUCCGGC
Model HL_68493.4  matched a sequence 106 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,  11 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence CUGGGAUG
Model HL_33612.1  matched a sequence 107 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWH-F-F-s55, sequence CUUUUGG
Model HL_37407.1  matched a sequence 108 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35, sequence GAGUAUC
Model HL_75091.3  matched a sequence 110 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUUGCGGGAC
Model HL_84050.1  matched a sequence 112 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSH-s55, sequence CCAGUUAG
Model HL_46463.1  matched a sequence 113 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.57%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence UUUCGA
Model HL_80105.3  matched a sequence 113 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.90%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACUUCGGU
Model HL_77081.1  matched a sequence 114 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.75%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSW-s35-s55-s35, sequence UGAAAAG
Model HL_90961.1  matched a sequence 115 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55, sequence CGCAUAG
Model HL_49196.2  matched a sequence 116 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s33-s55-s35, sequence AUUCCCAUU
Model HL_50959.1  matched a sequence 117 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAUGAG
Model HL_56089.1  matched a sequence 117 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWW-s35-F-F-s35, sequence CCGAAUAG
Model HL_35894.3  matched a sequence 119 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-s33-F-s35, sequence UAGUAA
Model HL_16845.5  matched a sequence 121 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35, sequence CUUAUCG
Model HL_24625.1  matched a sequence 121 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s53-s55, sequence CAGUG
Model HL_69774.3  matched a sequence 121 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.65%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s33-tSW-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAACAC
Model HL_25183.1  matched a sequence 123 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.06%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35, sequence CUGUUCG
Model HL_60357.1  matched a sequence 123 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35, sequence GUAUUC
Model HL_51033.1  matched a sequence 127 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-s35, sequence GGUCUC
Model HL_68529.1  matched a sequence 128 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.84%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence GAGUCC
Model HL_24403.1  matched a sequence 129 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.38%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAAAUC
Model HL_58912.1  matched a sequence 131 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.19%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F, sequence CUGUUG
Model HL_60140.1  matched a sequence 132 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACUGAAGAU
Model HL_86769.2  matched a sequence 132 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSH-s55, sequence AGGGUCAU
Model HL_41285.1  matched a sequence 144 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.81%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-s35, sequence GAACUC
Model HL_42733.3  matched a sequence 144 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGGCGAAAG
Model HL_44730.2  matched a sequence 146 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.96%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CCUUGG
Model HL_32617.1  matched a sequence 156 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.75%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH, sequence UUGGUA
Model HL_69818.1  matched a sequence 156 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.47%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSW-s35-s55, sequence UGUAAG
Model HL_12053.1  matched a sequence 163 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.41%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35, sequence CGCAACG
Model HL_44781.1  matched a sequence 163 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.24%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35, sequence GUUCAC
Model HL_30541.1  matched a sequence 165 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.29%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-F, sequence CAUUCG
Model HL_80171.1  matched a sequence 165 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.43%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-s35-s35-s33, sequence GUCUC
Model HL_52240.1  matched a sequence 171 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.40%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence AAAUUU
Model HL_62869.2  matched a sequence 176 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.78%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence GGGAAC
Model HL_00996.1  matched a sequence 181 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.30%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence GUCUUC
Model HL_82678.2  matched a sequence 182 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.99%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-F, sequence CAUGUGG
Model HL_14859.1  matched a sequence 191 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.15%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F-F-F, sequence GGAAAC
Model HL_25660.1  matched a sequence 191 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.45%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-F-s35, sequence CGAAUAG
Model HL_46142.7  matched a sequence 193 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.37%,  20 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUACUUGA
Model HL_96283.1  matched a sequence 193 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.53%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CUUAUG
Model HL_56387.1  matched a sequence 209 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.44%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWH-s35-s53-s55, sequence AUUUU
Model HL_53189.1  matched a sequence 213 times, TP 100.00%, TN  85.51%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s53, sequence CUCUG
Model HL_98995.6  matched a sequence 219 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.01%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UACCAA
Model HL_69941.1  matched a sequence 223 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.16%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CGCGUG
Model HL_04891.1  matched a sequence 229 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.73%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGAGAG
Model HL_76360.1  matched a sequence 229 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.19%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence GUGUCC
Model HL_32527.2  matched a sequence 243 times, TP 100.00%, TN  90.59%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35, sequence GGAAAC
Model HL_43527.1  matched a sequence 243 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.16%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGCCGAG
Model HL_18218.2  matched a sequence 249 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.92%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-F-F-s35, sequence GCCUAGGAC
Model HL_14286.1  matched a sequence 251 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-F-F-s35, sequence CGGAUG
Model HL_70970.1  matched a sequence 259 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.28%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-s35, sequence UCUAA
Model HL_86880.4  matched a sequence 269 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.90%,  12 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUCGUC
Model HL_40469.1  matched a sequence 275 times, TP 100.00%, TN  90.30%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F, sequence CGAAUAG
Model HL_96776.2  matched a sequence 287 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.95%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-F, sequence AAAAUU
Model HL_33507.2  matched a sequence 292 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-s55, sequence UUUUA
Model HL_16898.2  matched a sequence 297 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.99%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55, sequence UGAAAGG
Model HL_69459.1  matched a sequence 300 times, TP 100.00%, TN  82.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW, sequence CGCGUG
Model HL_02361.5  matched a sequence 305 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.81%,  16 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAACAA
Model HL_28567.3  matched a sequence 314 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.35%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence GAGUAC
Model HL_12703.2  matched a sequence 316 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.54%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence GGCCC
Model HL_79272.2  matched a sequence 318 times, TP 100.00%, TN  79.73%,  11 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35, sequence CGCAG
Model HL_22515.1  matched a sequence 320 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.44%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-F, sequence UGAAAA
Model HL_57204.1  matched a sequence 333 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.20%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-F-F-s35, sequence UGGAAA
Model HL_53987.3  matched a sequence 338 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.17%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWS-s35, sequence CUUAG
Model HL_46546.1  matched a sequence 341 times, TP 100.00%, TN  83.15%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s33-F-s35, sequence CUUG
Model HL_94352.4  matched a sequence 352 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.05%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F-F, sequence CUAAGUG
Model HL_62604.1  matched a sequence 390 times, TP 100.00%, TN  86.94%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s53-s53-s35, sequence UGAAAA
Model HL_05692.1  matched a sequence 400 times, TP 100.00%, TN  81.31%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CGUAGG
Model HL_68304.6  matched a sequence 403 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.45%,   8 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGACGAG
Model HL_36982.3  matched a sequence 441 times, TP 100.00%, TN  78.34%,  10 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CUGUG
Model HL_94386.1  matched a sequence 461 times, TP 100.00%, TN  82.73%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-F-s35, sequence GUGAAGC
Model HL_99223.1  matched a sequence 465 times, TP 100.00%, TN  76.92%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s33-s55-s35, sequence UUUAA
Model HL_57052.2  matched a sequence 468 times, TP 100.00%, TN  75.19%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35, sequence GUCAC
Model HL_95237.1  matched a sequence 474 times, TP 100.00%, TN  77.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35, sequence UUUGA
Model HL_06569.1  matched a sequence 484 times, TP 100.00%, TN  82.49%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35, sequence AGAAUU
Model HL_69353.6  matched a sequence 484 times, TP 100.00%, TN  68.81%,  17 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CUAG
Model HL_61984.1  matched a sequence 487 times, TP 100.00%, TN  77.73%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CUCGG
Model HL_02906.1  matched a sequence 493 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.26%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s35, sequence UGUAAG
Model HL_60914.1  matched a sequence 493 times, TP 100.00%, TN  77.56%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CUGGG
Model HL_18722.1  matched a sequence 655 times, TP 100.00%, TN  66.50%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-F, sequence GUCUC
Model HL_98557.4  matched a sequence 671 times, TP 100.00%, TN  70.07%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CAGAG
Model HL_05667.1  matched a sequence 732 times, TP 100.00%, TN  67.15%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55, sequence GGUAC
Model HL_22447.1  matched a sequence 897 times, TP 100.00%, TN  66.20%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s53-s55, sequence UUUUCA
Overall false positive rate is 35.2037%
Number of models giving false positives is 297 out of 310
Rate at which sequences have interior edit distance 0 is     8.41
Rate at which sequences have cutoff score greater than 50 is    15.60
